Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ring 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howch e ng {chat} 17:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The_Ring_3

Wikipedia is NOT a crystal ball. Mike _{(T C)} 00:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; once verifiable information is available, the article can be recreated. Wikipedia doesn't need to "scoop" anyone. --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 00:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is info that the movie will be made. However I know nothing more. -- Psi edit 00:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Film not yet officially announced therefore it should be deleted as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 01:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Article serves no purpose. Will 02:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. — Moe ε 03:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Blnguyen 04:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:12, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. --User:Wikiwkiwki333 16:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, true, but Dreamworks has announced the movie and limited info. If nothing else to set a place instead of just another red link!!!!! --J
Please sign your posts with ~~~~. Mike _{(T C)} 20:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since we don't even know yet whether it's a sequel or a prequel, which would seem to be very basic information. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Cnwb 00:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this was discussed a lot of times. All upcoming movies should be kept. Grue 17:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is ther a policy outlining this, or is this your opinion? Mike _{(T C)}

04:07, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit curious about that myself. When you say "all upcoming movies", does that include movies for which there is no available information about cast, director, writers, plot, or anything else that an encyclopedia entry about a movie would normally include? I ask because that's what your vote appears to say. --keepsleeping quit your job! slack off! 04:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the main Ring article as a sentence within, revisit article once more information is available. Calwatch 06:17, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.