Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rainbow Tulip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and there are no other rationale for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Rainbow Tulip[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is a merge/redirect to Pat Mora or Viking Children's Books but that could unbalance either article. Boleyn (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 18:10, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Boleyn, I've found some reviews and one article for the book. Please see the article. I'm thinking to keep this article per WP:NBOOK. Best, Bridget (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Latin America, Mexico, and Texas. Bridget (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the reviews added make it pass notability standards for novels. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:35, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination thanks, Bridget, I am happy t concede that this is notable. Boleyn (talk) 20:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.