Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quest for Juice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Quest for Juice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NBOOK; while I can find a few reviews, they are on personal blogs and user-edited sites, not the sort of thing that usually denotes notability. A self-published book of recent vintage, this does not appear to have yet generated the necessary attention. Nat Gertler (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looks like a self-published book that has no professional reviews. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no professional reviews, or independent public sources for reference. --Nlfestival (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is ultimately a non-notable independent book. It hasn't received reviews or coverage in any places that would be considered to be reliable. The article has some blog sources, but neither are the type that we'd consider to be RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.