Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Prop Store of London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 02:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Prop Store of London

Completing a nomination. Original reason (from talk page) follows. Tizio 15:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This listing should be removed for lack of citations and lack of notariety. One listing in a "best of the web" article does not constitute a Wikipedia reference because it is not solely an article about this one company. Further, just because a site artificially boosts their traffic via chep pop-up advertising so that their alexa rank looks high does not make them notable. Also, many, many people and other companies collect, buy, and sell props from even much bigger and better known movies than those listed here, but that doesn't make any of them notable. I can go down to the store and buy a poster for Star Wars and then sell it the next day too.... does that mean I am deserving of a Wikipedia listing? No! 61.7.158.230 10:44, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Spamvertisement. Mystache 16:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:VSCA. The Forbes article is a directory listing, and heavens knows how many "best of web" listings there are. The James Bond article is about a Christie's auction. The store is but the owner, and not the subject of the article. Ohconfucius 09:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like it fails WP:CORP. Pufnstuf 23:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.