Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Polish Ambassador

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Ambassador[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is primarily autobiography, created by the article's subject (see WP:AUTO & WP:CONFLICT) and appears primarily to be for self-promotion (WP:PROMO WP:NPOV), e.g. first paragraph is mostly copy-paste from a non-neutral source of subject talking about himself. None of the listed sources are reliable neutral sources (WP:RS) and most are dead links. Given all that, and since I couldn't find non-trivial reliable sources for establishing notability, subject doesn't appear to meet criteria for WP:GNG & WP:BAND. Goffman82 18:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Goffman82 19:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article and its talk page were created by User:Sugalski (the musician's real surname) and he did both in a rush back in 2010 and has not contributed to WP since. On the talk page he listed 12 then-recent sources. Ten of those are now dead, one points to something else, and the sole survivor from a publication called Tunequest [1] is possibly reliable. Of the citations used in the current article, seven could be considered independent of the musician and all of them are dead too. I also found this: [2], which is possibly reliable but it's a friendly and non-critical media introduction that may be a copied PR release. I can find nothing else beyond the usual self-created social media and streaming sites. He's done a lot but with minimal notice from the reliable music media. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Your second source [3] is an artist management & booking agency, listing the musician as a current client elsewhere on the site. Confirms your suspicion this is simply a (paid) PR release. Goffman82 23:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant advertising, especially with the evidence provided by Doomsdayer520. AdoTang (talk) 21:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Doomsdayer. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Steamboat2020 (talk) 13:45, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.