Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pointe at North Fayette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 15:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Pointe at North Fayette

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and, as noted in 2018, also fails WP:NGEO. Only one source from a newspaper story from 1960, which briefly mentions the mall by a former name in passing within a story about another entity. The balance of the article is nothing more than a collection of links to commercial websites for the what purports to be the mall occupant stores. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 14:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:NOTPRICE This "retail development " is in reality a shopping complex, and lists every retailer and service therein, with individual article links to each. And those individual articles have a link to their own websites. The few that do not have a Wikipedia article, have direct links to their own web sites. — Maile (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, after removing the WP:ELNO, WP:CRYSTAL, redlinks, and WP:TENANTS dreck, there is the bones of a salvageable stub here. Cabayi (talk) 16:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable retail development. Dough4872 17:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Incredibly generic edge city power center with the expected stores you'd expect to find at one named Mad Libs-style. Nate • (chatter) 21:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.