Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phoenix Requiem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus to delete; whether to merge or not can be worked out on talk. Stifle (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Phoenix Requiem

This webcomic does not appear to meet the notability criteria listed at WP:WEB. While it has been nominated for several awards, it has apparently not received any. Robin S (talk) 11:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 16:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WEB, footnote six - part of the bit that talks about awards - mentions that repeated nominations also indicate notability. Now, it does specify awards on multiple years, but 11 award nominations in the single year that this has been eligible is insane, so I feel that a keep is justified here. (Letter of the law be damned - the core principles are goals, the rules are tools.) --Kiz o r 19:54, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this with Inverloch (webcomic) or this and Inverloch to Sarah Ellerton, cut all the unsourced original research, and let's see if we can make an encyclopedia article. --Dragonfiend (talk) 18:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 14:58, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I agree with the merge thing. Sarah Ellerton is quite a talented and prevailant artist. It would probably make sence to create an article for her and state both comics there (Inverloch and The Phoenix Requiem). On another thought, this would probly violate her privacy too much, so maybe it would be better to create an article about the Seraph-Inn (seraph-inn.com), which is the entry for both webcomics and just merge both articles there. - Seth Kriticos

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm with Kizor, eleven nominations in one year is too impressive to delete it. Tualha (Talk) 18:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Though it occurs to me that so little discussion here probably implies that not many people are reading the article. Still, I'm inclusionist; keeping the article does no harm. Tualha (Talk) 09:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.