Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phish Book

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phishheads#Books. Jenks24 (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Phish Book[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK - could easily be summarized in a section in the Phish article. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no claim of notability. The only information here is that which you would find in a {{cite book}}. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Phishheads#Books, where this and all of the fan-made books can be covered by reliable sources, as an alternative to deletion. czar 23:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 04:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon Kolbert and Power~enwiki, would the redirect be a suitable outcome for you? czar 05:38, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Czar: Yep! Seems like the most reasonable course of action. Same goes for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pharmer's Almanac. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, a new section at Phishheads for these various books seems appropriate. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, nom is correct, there's no justification for a separate article here, and a brief mention at Phish is all that is needed. Same goes for the similar Phish items here at AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Phishheads#Books as the first choice, Phish as second choice. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 01:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.