Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Philippine School, Dubai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I was the only person in the last seven days of discussion who wanted to delete, and I no longer do. How about that. (non-admin closure) jp×g 19:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Philippine School, Dubai[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school. No sources seem to exist (that I could find, anyway); article is totally unreferenced. Has a dated {{unreferenced}} in its first revision, which indicates to me it was likely copypasted from a deleted article. jp×g 07:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. jp×g 07:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. jp×g 07:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. "Philippine School Dubai wins High School Challenge organised by DCT". Gulf News. Retrieved 2021-09-01. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. @JPxG: I added several references. Most secondary schools are notable, but sometimes finding references can be difficult. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Added sources seem to meet the threshold of GNG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above: these sources seem to pass WP:GNG and the nominator is a lazy jackass for not finding them himself (although -- it must be said -- he is quite good-looking). jp×g 18:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.