Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phamicles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. self promotion and web content without any claim of notabiliy (WP:CSD#G11 and WP:CSD#A7) SoWhy 22:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Phamicles[edit]
- The Phamicles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability, published two weeks ago, google knows nothing about it although this story collection is originally published online. Clearly fails WP:NOTE.
PROD (with two editors supporting it) was declined by the author, it was previously speedily deleted as an A7, and is a borderline G11 blatant advertising as it is. AmaltheaTalk 18:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as blatant self-stated promotion of as yet non-notable writing effort. Interesting though, good luck with the project! ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Blatant advertising, or simply delete based on a complete lack of notability. Theseeker4 (talk) 19:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete also due to non-notability. - chicgeek talk 19:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although maybe if rewritten in the future with sources, I might reconsider. 89.243.56.221 (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 20:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.