Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Parallax Saga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 05:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Parallax Saga[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD was contested. The only reason a stand-alone article on this topic should exist is if the information about this story was weighing down the articles The Parallax: Hypersleep Dialogues and The Parallax II: Future Sequence. Also, if this article to were exist, it should also be based on the band's explanation of the plot, not someone else's literary analysis. According to the only source in the article: "[...] we apologise if some of the explanations are aimless, or even completely incorrect. The theories and interpretation in these articles are simply that; our interpretations. Everything outlined here is subject to change if enough evidence to the contrary is presented. Please feel free to elaborate and come up with your own ideas of the story and continue the discussion in the comments section below." Fezmar9 (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:33, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Merge with the two other articles mentioned above. Notable only in their context. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable by itself, no indications that it has some notability. Looks to be against WP:GNG. Might be worth maybe a passing note or two in the two album articles or the one about the band, but that's all that's warranted. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}^{remember the past...} 03:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.