Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The P-Principle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The P-Principle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this principle is notable in any way. Article is original research posted by the creator of said principle. Prod contested by author without improving the article. --Finngall ^talk 16:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. While searches on News and Highbeam returned a couple of hits, they were not about this p-principle. Same with Scholar and books. JSTOR returned zip. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.