Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Otherworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Otherworld[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite an extensive search for sources, I simply failed to find enough significant independent reliable coverage for this film. Most of what I could find are press releases, movie profiles, promotional material, and even false positives. Apparently this film was screened at a film festival which makes me hesitant to nominate this for deletion, but coverage (including reviews) is sorely lacking; the film apparently doesn't even have a Rotten Tomatoes page. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFILM. Also uses IMDb as a source which bumps into WP:RS/IMDB. If it ever gains larger notability then the article can be recreated. MarnetteD|Talk 01:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 23:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant independent coverage and no indication that WP:NFILM applies. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a press release that was distributed, such as [1] at WTVM, but there's little independent coverage. There's an entry in AllMovie's database but no review. From the IMDb entry, it was recently released, so maybe it will get enough reviews to satisfy our inclusion criteria later. It could be userfied or moved to draft space if the creator wants, but it's so short that I'm not sure there's much point in doing so without a request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For reasons stated above. lbmarshall (talk) 12:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.