Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Otago Rambler
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Otago Rambler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:SINGER. Subject has not been published in reliable and independent sources. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and New Zealand. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:53, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The article does not demonstrate how this person was notable. It is not true, however, that the "subject has not been published in reliable and independent sources". The Otago Daily Times is both reliable and independent. Schwede66 05:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.