Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orchard Hills Estate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Orchard Hills Estate[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

housing estate, presumably, below notability Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no claim of notability made. Bazonka (talk) 08:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Kingswood, New South Wales. No reason it can't be mentioned in the parent article. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete unreferenced term. Oppose redirect as there are several at least 2 orchard hills localities in the world. LibStar (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that call for disambiguation? Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not finding coverage in reliable sources, let alone significant coverage. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.