Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Noodle Companies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Noodle Companies[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A before search only shows press releases & sponsored posts hence indicative of unreliable sources. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 20:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cited multiple reliable sources. Also, if you Google the appropriate search terms you will find many more. I am getting my mind around them and adding them to the article.Classafelonymonkey (talk) 20:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify this brand new page while the author continues to improve the article. The sources look pretty promotional to me, but I'm willing to give the author a chance—just not in main space. pburka (talk) 21:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When this was originally nominated I decided to give the creator of it time to improve the article so it would pass WP:NCORP, because I thought maybe it could. It seems that never happened though. Since the sources are still bad and trivial. Plus, the article is still written in an extremely run of the mill way. Which I don't think can be improved enough to make it warrant an article. I don't think drafting it so it can be fixed is viable option at this point either, because the creator has already had enough time to try and improve it. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.