Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New Climate Economy Report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The New Climate Economy Report

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be nothing more than a facsimile of the subject itself, parroting the content of each section of the document under identical section titles. 67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even if this were a notable document, which I don't think it is, there is nothing here which should be in the resulting article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: irretrievably unencyclopedic. What I mean by that is, as 67.14.236.50 said, this is essentially a re-telling of the report, not a discussion of the report. Almost nothing in this article can be salvaged. If this is a notable topic, it needs a complete re-write, and a suitable encyclopedia article about it would maybe cover a tenth of the length of this article. --Slashme (talk) 23:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.