Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nerdpocalypse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Nerdpocalypse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionably notable as my searches simply found no better coverage and sourcing with the best being this and there's no obvious better improvement for this article from May 2012. SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem to be covered by reliable sources. Google searches are limited to social networking sites and blogs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging interested subject users NinjaRobotPirate, The1337gamer, Esquivalience, Czar, DMacks, Primefac and Salvidrim.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough significant coverage in reliable. Fails WP:WEBCRIT and GNG. —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:40, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.