Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Narrow Way (Newsletter)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Narrow Way (Newsletter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article admits that this is a magazine only for members of the Assemblies of Yahweh, totaling at most a thousand readers. I cannot find any outside sources other than this single mention of its creation. Propose delete and redirect to Assemblies of Yahweh. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- They are many references to the Narrow Way on the internet: [1] In Citer (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- cmt Not that google or yahoo hits are sufficient to demonstrate notability but the hits in your yahoo link above, with the exception of the hit to this wikipedia page, are mostly to appearances of the phrase "the narrow way" in contexts that have nothing to do with this newsletter.Bali ultimate (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Which is why it's so difficult to find sources. I've checked Google books and scholar as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- They are many references to the Narrow Way on the internet: [1] In Citer (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per no reliable sources currently in the article or findable by me to provide verifiability and demonstrate notability.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, no RS. ukexpat (talk) 21:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sufficient reliable sources are missing. Seems to be little more than a church bulletin. JodyB talk 21:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Urban dealt (talk) 22:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.