Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Munich Times
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Munich Times[edit]
- The Munich Times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possible advertisement. Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 02:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait... This article *could* be improved, but I'm not sure... --Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 02:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, if it's an advertisement it's a pretty lousy one, so don't delete on that score. The article can most definitely be improved, which is a good argument for....... improving it, not deleting it. Emeraude (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete So far as I can tell, there's no paper in this "newspaper". It's a website, and a non-notable one at that. Mandsford (talk) 15:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very recently started, no indication of notability at all. Hans Adler 23:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Notability is not established. Not published to Google News, not mainstream, and as the others said, likely doesn't even publish anything in the real world. American Eagle (talk) 04:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.