Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mount Players
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily Deleted per G12 of this by SarekOfVulcan. NAC -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 06:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Mount Players[edit]
- The Mount Players (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable amateur theatre company. No reliable, independent sources asserting notability provided. This is a contested PROD, details of contesting can be found at User talk:Trlovejoy#The Mount Players and on the article talk page. Mattinbgn\talk 04:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\talk 04:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am surprised that this company, which has been going for 37 years, has not been noticed, but a quick search finds nothing independent. Someone must have noted it. The original author does not understand that "notability" on wikipdia, simply means being noted by others. This could be a useful article if notability can be established. I remain neutral for now. --Bduke (Discussion) 05:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I spent some time attempting to locate evidence of notability but was unable to do so beyond a few references in the local media as to various performances. The bulk of the article is a direct lift from the company's website. florrie 06:53, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.