Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Moss Cider Project (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Moss Cider Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CLUB. Local group that had limited coverage around its founding, which was the source of the last AfD no consensus. But looking at it after some time has passed it still appears to fail both WP:INDEPTH and WP:PERSISTENCE, as well as WP:GNG. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:ORG. the best people could come up with was 2 sources. We don't create articles for entities that hinge on 2 sources after all that searching. LibStar (talk) 16:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:ORG. Per the article, they made 35 litres of cider. To put that into perspective, that's about 9 gallons, enough for a couple dozen thirsty people. 35 litres is also a common size for those drink backpacks hikers sometimes wear as well as a very small aquarium. While I'm sure it was delicious, that's no more notable than a kids' lemonade stand, a church bake sale, or a family picnic. Not every fun activity is suitable for an encyclopedia article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.