Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monk Who Became Chief Minister

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein. North America1000 03:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Monk Who Became Chief Minister[edit]

The Monk Who Became Chief Minister (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability : reference points to amazon, flipkart and the other links does not portray any notability, the only link which it mentions is link from the publisher of the book Shrikanthv (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dont feel it lacks notability. It has links from Hindustan Times, Bloomsbury, India.com, Business Standard, The week, The pioneer, Indian Express, United News of India etc. The book would be launching on 25th August, hence we can expect more reference links to inflow with time.Royaal (talk) 05:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL Spiderone 10:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep appears to be enough coverage for notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 04:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.