Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Minks (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Minks (band)[edit]

The Minks (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. scope_creepTalk 20:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep/ Weak delete. I'm finding a lot of local news kinds of press in multiple American cities like this, this, this, and this (mix of interview and non-interview material). I also found a decent independent magazine article here. This magazine article is a interview. Here is an album review; although I am unsure about the significance of this source. This source confirms they are a band with Broadcast Music, Inc.; which indicates some degree of notability. It's a borderline call.4meter4 (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:44, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Early band coverage, but it is quite a lot, probably passes sigcov, although nobody is listening to them. Very very early stage stuff. scope_creepTalk 11:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:43, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think it is WP:TOOSOON. Their last single on youtube [[1]] has 4.5k views. I think if there was more mainstream views I would be happier. scope_creepTalk 11:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.