Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mendota Beacon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Mendota Beacon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced exclusively to state publications. Two-year print run. Probably wouldn't meet WP:ORG. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 23:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not seeing anything I'd consider significant coverage in RS. A redirect to Leadership Institute might be a possibility, but there's not likely a close/clear enough link between the two apart from the fact that they provided startup funding for the paper. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added coverage form the Chicago Tribune which I believe satisfies your sourcing concern.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We have a million articles (~) on defunct publications, many of them short-lived. We WP:PRESERVE them as part of the historical record (recording history is part of what encyclopedias do) and because they are useful to our users.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - passes V, NPOV, NOR, in my opinion. Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.