Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Maine Edge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no "clear" arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Maine Edge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. Neutral. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 00:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't favor it. I think it outlines a growing trend, and just posted an article that contrasts the free vs. paid debate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eaglesfan215 (talk • contribs) 12:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep RSes, notable content, keep it.Simonm223 (talk) 02:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There be enough o' yer WP:RS fer notability. Yar! Chzz ► 23:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.