Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magnificent Marriage (1975)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 05:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Magnificent Marriage (1975)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from the first line, it's entirely a plot summary which, unusually, seems to be WP:OR rather than a copyright violation. No sources. I would have speedy deleted this if it wasn't excluded because it's a book Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - From a bit of research, it looks like the book has found some commercial success and been commented about on blogs, but it has never made enough of a splash to get notable reviews. To be frank, this is just another romantic drama novel out of the hundreds upon hundreds published in the U.S. in the last century, not being notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's a possibility of archived sources but my searches found nothing convincingly good with this and this (maybe it's mentioned? Not easy to see) being the best results. Summarily, there's not much. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect to Barbara_Cartland_bibliography#Single_titles_2. This looks like it's one of several hundred of books by this author, who is extremely, extremely well known for being ridiculously prolific. There's some merit to redirecting it to her bibliography page, as redirects are cheap, but I don't really see where this would merit its own page. However on the flip side, I can also see arguing for deletion since she has so many books - about 700+ in all - and I'm not sure that redirecting to that page would really be all that helpful. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.