Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magic of Christmas (Celtic Woman album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Guy (help!) 13:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Magic of Christmas (Celtic Woman album)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everything that's worst about record articles: most of the content is self-sourced to the band, the baloance is sources that are supplied by the band's representation (e.g. AMG). No attempt is made at any assertion of notability other than by inheritance. And the album itself is a seasonal potboiler with nothing novel at all. Guy (help!) 23:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Redirect back to Celtic Woman and speedy close. While I am a fan of this group, I am impartial. This article has gone through at least 3 removal of redirects back to the group's main article, at least 2 being by me. Restore the redirect and remove this notice! Haseo9999 (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As noted on talk page, Redirect to group in absence of a couple of reviews - which do not seem to be available. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:13, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 12:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 00:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine. You can delete it, I moved it to the draft space for now Kay girl 97 (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment JzG, Kay girl 97 has copy/pasted the article into draft space so they can continue trying to find sources for it. Might a better solution be to delete that new draft, userfy this article (to retain the history), and then set up a redirect at the article title? If Kay girl 97 can find enough independent sources to satisfy notability requirements, the draft could then be moved back into article space. GirthSummit _(blether) 09:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No objections from me. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.