Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magic Shop (1903)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already redirected. Shereth 22:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Magic Shop (1903) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wiki isn't a repository for short stories, surely? Ged UK (talk) 21:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete; no context. Also, copyright violation. I have never seen that many deletion tags on one page ;) Plrk (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The matter has been resolved and the article is now a redirect to the author. Could someone please close this? Plrk (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it a copyvio if the story is from 1903? However, a redirect is fine for now until an article about the story is developed. Corvus cornixtalk 21:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The author didn't die until 1946, and I thought copyright lasted 70 years after the death of the author? Plrk (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought it was from the time of the publication, but I'm not an expert. Corvus cornixtalk 21:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, neither am I, but I would assume that the people at Wikisource kind of are, so it seems you're right. Plrk (talk) 21:53, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought it was from the time of the publication, but I'm not an expert. Corvus cornixtalk 21:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The author didn't die until 1946, and I thought copyright lasted 70 years after the death of the author? Plrk (talk) 21:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it a copyvio if the story is from 1903? However, a redirect is fine for now until an article about the story is developed. Corvus cornixtalk 21:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It appears someone has boldly redirected it to H. G. Wells. I was going to recommend a transwiki to Wikisource, but it's already there. AnturiaethwrTalk 21:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.