Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Magic Portal
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Brickfilm. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Magic Portal[edit]
- The Magic Portal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:FILM as all the coverage listed in the article is WP:SPS or WP:PRIMARY, and it doesn't meet any of the "Other evidence of notability" standards. Doesn't appear to meet standards of WP:WEB either, although potential exists for merging or redirecting to brickfilm. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or Redirect to Brickfilm. Unless theres some independent coverage of this film the nominator or I haven't seen, we should include in the Brickfilm article that it was the first brickfilm ever made. It would still be notable to most people as the first Brickfilm, so I think its worth a mention, but not on its own article. EditorEat ma talk page up, scotty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 16:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.