Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Loverterian's Decree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. This is not an article. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Loverterian's Decree[edit]
- The Loverterian's Decree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research, essay; PROD removed by author. GILO A&E⇑ 23:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's difficult to know what part of WP:NOT to cite as a rationale, since there are so many ways in which this thing fails to resemble an encyclopedia article. I'll go with WP:NOTFORUM. Deor (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete We could make it a contest, and see how many legitimate reasons to delete this "article" can be advanced before someone closes this debate. One per customer, please. I will take no original research. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a soapbox. -- Whpq (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 15:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:MADEUP — frankie (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- SNOW delete, unencyclopedic, unsalvageable. Hairhorn (talk) 22:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unreferenced CapMan07008 (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per all reasons above. ItsZippy (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.