Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Things Give You Away

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minutes to Midnight (album). - Mailer Diablo 18:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Things Give You Away[edit]

Non notable Linkin Park song. Not a single and the article doesn't seem to define notability. Possibly an example of over zealous fans creating articles on non notable items when they could be condensed into an album page. Rehevkor 01:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect any appropriately sourced content to Minutes to Midnight (album), with no prejudice to have an article on the song assuming it ever becomes a notable single. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the album. I see nothing to merge. The only source is a fansite posting of a supposed magazine article, which is far from reliable. If this is released as a single then the article can be re-established with such quaint things as facts and sources. Otto4711 01:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
redirect per Otto. Standard practice here. --W.marsh 02:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the album. I agree completely. No single, no notability, no article.

TeamOverload 13:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect I can't this every growing into a very good article. mako (talk•contribs) 17:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright can we just do something with it already then? TeamOverload 13:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just leave it alone. Why bother with it? Linkin Park has talked about the song.

And that makes it notable enough for Wikipedia how? Rehevkor 14:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The information on this song has been on a lot of fansites. It is not nonsense. The page isn't hurting any one.

You didn't answer the question. Rehevkor 14:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's such a petty question, but ok. Linkin Park wrote the song. That is reliable. LP Association, LP:Fuse, and other LP sites have all kinds of stuff like that. Just seems like a waste of energy to me.

LP may have written it. It may be "reliable", whatever you mean by that. But is it notable? It's not a single. It's not even been released. No awards. Nothing. Is wikipedia a LP fan site now? You can sourse an article as much as you like, but it doesn't make it notable. If you think otherwise, edit the article and write why it's notable, because right now, there's nothing to say it is. Rehevkor 14:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to album page, as the bit about the solo is useful info to record. The song as itself, however, is not currently notable enough to warrant a page of its own. U-Mos 15:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.