Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Literature Express

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lasha_Bugadze#Novels. MBisanz ^talk 00:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Literature Express

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to be a notable novel. I've sourced one review, but I don't find anything else. Perhaps someone who's better at searching can find references to confer notability in the original language of the title. Previously PROD'ed by Piotrus (talk · contribs); PROD was removed without discussion or explanation. Mikeblas (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BK. --Edcolins (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect over to Lasha_Bugadze#Novels. From my searching, it looks like even the foreign language Wikipedia versions have little information on this book. It appears to be only a bit notable, and the article we're looking at here ought to be deleted. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close without action. A book by a notable author, issued by a notable publisher, would typically be redirected rather than deleted, even if it were no more substantial than Garfield's Greatest Flea Dips. AFD is not the place to decide an issue limited to redirect or not. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The notability of the author is not the issue at hand; neither is the notability of the publisher. -- Mikeblas (talk) 20:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.