Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lion King IV
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Coredesat 03:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Lion King IV[edit]
- The Lion King IV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There are just 90 Google hits for "lion king iv" and 722 for "lion king 4; nearly all of them are from fan discussion forums or fanfic sites. The idea of a fourth Lion King sequel is unverifiable speculation. szyslak (t, c) 17:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've done some further investigation. The article claims that Kiara's daughter and Kopa's son fall in love. As fans of the Lion King sequels and comic books know, Kiara and Kopa are brother and sister. Basically, the premise behind this article is that Disney's making a movie about cousins marrying. Really, would Disney even consider producing such a movie? This article's more than "unverifiable speculation". It's a silly, childish hoax. I've tagged it as such. szyslak (t, c) 10:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Incest is common in animals -24.92.43.153 13:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but it's not common in Disney movies. szyslak (t, c) 17:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Besides that was put in by some random person. The plot will be about Vitani & Simba, whom are not even remotely related. -24.92.43.153 21:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The previous comment referred to an earlier version. If you're so convinced of the truthfulness of this article, please provide a reliable source confirming it. But there is none, because it's complete nonsense. szyslak (t, c) 22:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Besides that was put in by some random person. The plot will be about Vitani & Simba, whom are not even remotely related. -24.92.43.153 21:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but it's not common in Disney movies. szyslak (t, c) 17:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Incest is common in animals -24.92.43.153 13:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- REVERT AND CLEAN-UP-Re-name the article The Lion King 4 and start a major clean-up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dalejenkins (talk • contribs)
- By "revert" do you mean "keep"? Since this article was just created, there is nothing to "revert" to. Also, do you know of any reliable sources that confirm Disney is producing a film called "The Lion King IV/4"? Because I haven't found any. szyslak (t, c) 19:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as being unverifiable speculation. Nothing in reliable sources confirms that this film exists. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 19:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystalballery. --Dennisthe2 20:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystal-ballArnoutf 20:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverified crystal balling. -- IslaySolomon | talk 21:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as above, and zip about this at the Disney website.SkierRMH, 02:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as above. The Kids Aren't Alright 02:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NOT#CBALL.--Grand Slam 7 | Talk 12:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This page was created to peddle a fan's version of the film and deliberately fool people. [1] It's complete and utter rubbish. Blue Phoenix 17:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references. The JPStalk to me 13:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.