Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Libertarian Program
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shereth 17:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Libertarian Program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article was created in 2005 by an anonymous IP. While there was in the long ago a Libertarian Party program, and may even have been some linkage between some LP members and Libertarian International Organization (which itself doesn't have an article), this program is most definitively defunct. There are two main external links - The Libertarian Program (This is defunct) Libertarian Party web site (This has newest and relatively shorter platform) So basically its an old advertisement for a defunct project. Reason}} Carol Moore 00:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete spam. WillOakland (talk) 00:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wow, IP-created articles seem so weird to me. The way it's written it could be a potential G11. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just tagged it for speedy deletion as an advertisement. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 01:42, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, basically an advert. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for an article which has been denied db-spam, it sure has a large bunch of WP:LINKSPAM. There are no independent sources which attest to its notability. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a notable subject if the program was given up on. BTW, if people were inclined to follow a "program" they probably wouldn't become libertarians in the first place. Northwestgnome (talk) 04:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Reggie Perrin (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.