Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend of Ares

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AFD is not a cleanup tag. --Core desat 08:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Legend of Ares

Violates WP:NOT as the entire article reads like a how-to for the video game. Article should be deleted and completely rewritten. NMajdan•talk 19:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that everything below the introduction needs to go. I'm willing to spend some time re-writing this. In fact, I'd just finished wikifying the introduction as you tagged for deletion :) I'm very new to the wiki, so I'm not sure how the deletion process works, but I'm happy to edit the existing article to make it encyclopedic, rather than delete Superfurrycannibal 19:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. Uncle G 21:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 19:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Partial delete. Agree with Superfurrycannibal - introduction should be retained as a stub and the rest deleted. Madmedea 19:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That is actually a "keep" opinion, given that it does not anywhere involve an administrator hitting the delete button. If you want an article edited, be bold and edit it! Uncle G 21:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Partial delete per previous entries.Itsmejudith 20:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The tag for "this article should be completely rewritten" is {{cleanup-rewrite}}, not {{afd1}}. AFD is not cleanup, and rewriting is a matter of cleanup. Please only nominate articles for deletion where an administrator hitting a delete button is the only solution to the problem. Uncle G 21:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems like it's notable to me, just needs sourcing and drastically cleaning up - no reason for an AfD. CiaranG 22:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but needs massive cleanup. Also, AfD is not for cleanup. --Alan Au 19:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: AfD is not cleanup! Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.