Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legal Stop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:53, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Legal Stop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable startup company, no significant coverage. Only sources are their own website and a press release. GermanJoe (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam. Bearian (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- 2 years for citation needed on it's only real notable claim -- IamM1rv (talk) 12:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not cited for two years is not an argument for deletion. If the tag had been there for two hundred years, it would still be necessary to actually look for sources. James500 (talk) 07:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.