Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lazarus Child
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Lazarus Child (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a link from the Calgary Herald via Newspapers.com. Needs more coverage in order to be eligible. The Film Creator (talk) 01:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 01:23, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I did find a link from Screen International. I’d be willing to withdraw if anyone can please find a review on this film from a reliable source. The Film Creator (talk) 01:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Review at CineMagazine [1] DonaldD23 talk to me 02:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Excellent work, User:Donaldd23. I knew you’d rescue this article. I speedy withdraw this nomination. The Film Creator (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.