Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Laurier English and Academic Foundation program

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Laurier English and Academic Foundation program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable academic program. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Every individual program at every individual university does not automatically get its own standalone article. Some such programs certainly can be sourced as independently notable topics in their own right — typically the professional programs like journalism, medicine, architecture, education, law or MBA schools, much more frequently than the "routine" programs like English literature, psychology or academic transition — but no evidence has been shown or reliably sourced here that this one would qualify as one of the special cases. Plus, I'm guessing direct conflict of interest editing by a student in the program. Bearcat (talk) 17:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; no coverage and the article itself contains no indication that the program is especially notable. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.