Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Latter Day Church of Christ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The Latter Day Church of Christ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I have not been able to independently source this article. See here and here. The Prod was removed by a third party without a reason being given. I notified the creator of the Prod but that has not produced any sources. Clearly fails WP:V. Delete. TerriersFan 04:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 04:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 04:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteas I couldn't find anything either, and I think it's clear that this Matthew Gill didn't start any churches. FrozenPurpleCube 06:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- However, it seems that a group with the name does exist. [1] We may need a redirect to Latter-day Church of Christ instead. FrozenPurpleCube 06:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Latter-day Church of Christ Alf photoman 15:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - a merge is not possible because these are different churches in different countries. The Latter-day Church of Christ practice polygamy whereas this lot don't. (There are several churches with similar names). I think the Derbyshire one may well be a hoax. TerriersFan 15:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- indeed, that's why a redirect might be the better choice. FrozenPurpleCube 18:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Verifiability is a cornerstone Wikipedia policy. We shouldn't hold on to unverifiable information, hoping someone will come along and rectify it. -/- Warren 10:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. -- Szvest - Wiki me up ® 13:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Warren --BenWhitey 03:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.