Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last of us (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The Last of Us#Adaptations and possible sequel. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- The Last of us (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't exactly meet any of the speedy deletion criteria, but the article has no sources, is most likely non-notable, and is possibly a hoax (namely because of that "made by naughty dog" part). Biblioworm 19:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It does have an entry on IMDB, but this fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Last of Us, where the in-development film is already discussed. As Google and GNews searches will bear out, the project is receiving coverage, such as [1][2][3], but I don't see that anything has happened yet that makes a separate article appropriate per WP:NFF. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Please note that The Last of Us (film) (correctly capitalized) has existed as a redirect to The Last of Us#Film adaptation since 7 March 2014.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 20:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete this three-sentence, unsourced stub as waaaay TOO soon. WHEN the film meets WP:NF, we will be rebuilding a properly sourced article under the proper spelling. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:18, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect - I agree that its TOOSOON for it to have any article, but if there's sourced, accurate information at another target (the video game), and its a plausible search term, the redirecting is more appropriate than deleting outright. Sergecross73 msg me 04:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Last of Us#Adaptations and possible sequel since The Last of us is a plausible typo and the section in question contains relevant info on the subject.--69.157.253.160 (talk) 01:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to The Last of Us#Adaptations and possible sequel as atm it's all wp:crystal. –Davey2010 • (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.