Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Temptation of Christ RE-examined
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research; unsourced POV. The movie's critical evaluation is addressed in the main article - The Last Temptation of Christ#Critical Reception and Interpretation. --Muchness 09:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom. --Muchness 09:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete POV, original research. (aeropagitica) 09:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonsensical essay. Gazpacho 09:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per aeropagitica -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 10:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete etc. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 15:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:NOR. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 20:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Batmanand 20:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would have said merge to Last Temptation of Christ, but this topic is already covered there... and better. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 21:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete etc.--Mitsukai 00:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete aS POV GOofy ArticlE. Grandmasterka 04:20, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Essexmutant 15:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.