Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kingdom of Perpetual Muin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Kingdom of Perpetual Muin[edit]

Keep. It is clearly the first step in documenting the activities of a long term art project. The exhibition referred to is a first public showing and the project seems intended to continue for years. The entry does not disguise the fact that it is an art project but gives full detail of who and what is involved. I don't see why this should be different from any of the existing entries for an artist or a band on wikipedia.The project has it's own website and clearly exists and so should be documented. [francis mckee] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blimp77 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No real secondary sources. I feel it fails the Notability guidelines. Trevor Marron (talk) 10:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination; original fringe research and a non-notable neologism. In case you're curious, this is about a made-up esoteric art movement based on the Ogham letter 'M': The Kingdom of Perpetual Muin is an esoteric artistic movement which began in Glasgow Scotland, in the late stages of 2008. The word Muin literally means the Letter "M." It comes from the Gaelic alphabet of Ogham. Representing the name of the founder....Muin, according to legend their once existed an ancient Kingdom of Mu, but disappeared at the dawn of human history. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only secondary non-blog source I can find is a single mention in a list of dozens of other artists taking part in a one night exhibition. Arakunem^Talk 14:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 17:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.