Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kingdom of Apiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Kingdom of Apiya[edit]

It is an article about a micronation that is clearly not notable. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 21:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hosted on www.freehostia.com, not a single gnews hit, sounds more like a hoax to me. PHARMBOY (TALK) 21:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax / madeup nation, which the article pretty much openly admits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zero sources = zero notability. --Gene_poole (talk) 23:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- even if some sources can be found, this sounds more like an attempted secession from Montenegro, and thus might merit mentioning in that article. It'd also be worth checking out edits by Apiya (talk · contribs) who created the flag imagery and may simply be an account for edits by heads of state. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A quick look at Apiya (talk · contribs) user's page shows userboxes that indicate he 'watches South Park, loves Cartman, loves Borat, prefers coke over pepsi, pitys the fool, is a fan of the TV Charmed' and appears to have a userbox fetish. That or maybe each citizen of Apiya got to choose one userbox and the account is used by the entire country. PHARMBOY (TALK) 23:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: There are no reliable sources for this article. The article subject is fictional, and of interest only to Apiya (talk · contribs), who is the sole "citizen". --Gene_poole (talk) 00:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Amusing but not notable. Tadakuni (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think the article would be better received here, yes? Tadakuni (talk) 01:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.