Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Key of Avalon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'll create the proposed redirect in my capacity as an editor. Sandstein 18:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Key of Avalon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In doubt if this game is notable enough for inclusion. A quick check reveals 16k Google hits (effectively 172), a lot of them related. The Banner talk 22:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references to indicate how this meets WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My searches found nothing good at all. There are a few good move targets but it's probably best to delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note - The article creator is currently indef blocked, and actively socking and block evading. Its not a speedy delete, since he made it before he was indef blocked, but Admin/closer, please be wary of any WP:SPAs. They could be socks. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Search revealed nothing to show notability. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Search proves weak. Fishy creation account etc.Shinerite (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to List of Sega arcade video games. This is an obvious search term worthy of a redirect. Most of its relevant sourcing is offline but the little that exists shows that it was important for Sega: [1][2][3] (1up.com is a WP:VG/RS.) Also search without the "The". – czar 19:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.