Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Kappa Delta Sorority House at Washington State University

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Not on the National Register of Historic Places, just near one. Sources that mention the house appear to be either by Kappa Delta sorority, or by Washington State University. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note Ref 8, that it is in the French Ecletic Style is either from the school nor the Sorority, but rather from the State Department of Archeology and Preservation and the Kappa Delta House is pictured as one of the examples. Not sure that makes enough of a difference, but it should be noted.Naraht (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You are correct (though I see it as ref 9), I misread the citation and thought it was Washington State University's Department of Archaeology, not the State of Washington's Department of Archaeology. It's still a trivial mention, the only content about the sorority house is the picture. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agreed that it is Trivial, my comment was more for completeness.Naraht (talk) 01:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see anything to meet wp:GNG in the article or with google. Jeepday (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not the level of sources we would need to show this residence as a notable building.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth sources available to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.