Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jason Ellis Show (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Jason Ellis Show

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Minimally sourced article about a satellite radio program. While a nationally-distributed program like this would be eligible for an article if it were reliably sourced, it doesn't get a no-sourcing-required inclusion freebie just because it can be nominally verified as existing -- but the only "reference" here is an article on an unreliable clickbait site which isn't about this show, but simply namechecks its existence in the process of being about a person who once appeared on the show as a guest. That's not the kind of sourcing it takes to make something like this notable. The host has a better-sourced standalone BLP and other claims of notability beyond the show itself, so redirecting this there might also be an option -- but the show has to be much better referenced than this before it qualifies for a standalone article of its own separately from him. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per existence of numerous reliable sources popping up in google news. Granted, the majority of mentions are just that-- mentions, usually reporting on a variety of notable people who have shown up on the show. That said, the articles are in fact talking about the show, and talking about the 3rd parties who are appearing on the show in the context of the show, which should establish notability just fine. Beyond that, if I took the time to really DIG into the looooooong list of sources google news provides, I bet I could find at least one or two that are articles reviewing or otherwise about the show itself. Fieari (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable radio show. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:04, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.