Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Jaipur Dialogues (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Jaipur Dialogues

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NCORP is not met. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~. References seem adequate, but perhaps some references that oppose the conference and its organizers could be added. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not worth replying to you but we need non-conflicted (cc:Tayi Arajakate) reliable sources providing significant coverage. DNA is owned by a politician of the right-wing party, this conference aims to promote. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've been pinged here I'll avoid !voting but this one clearly lacks in depth coverage to satisfy WP:NCORP even if the Daily News & Analysis coverage was included. DNA itself hardly qualifies as a reliable source along with much of the other outlets of its parent group, due to their track record of both disinformation and undisclosed paid news. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 19:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't think this falls under canvassing — you were pinged due to your participation in the linked threads on Wion News. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so either but AfDs can be a contentious place and some people construe even appropriate notifications as canvassing, so rather I'd avoid that headache. I can't see this one having much chance of surviving anyways regardless of my participation, looking at the dearth of coverage. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 22:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This article from Scroll is about a similar event in Goa (with some short references to the Jaipur event). I am withdrawing my earlier Keep because I am having difficulty evaluating the independence of the media outlets reporting on the event. The company's proposed translation of an important Indian Muslim text suggests that the Jaipur Dialogues is more than just an event organizer. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:40, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because it fails to have the independent, in-depth significant coverage required by WP:NCORP. --Bejnar (talk) 02:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. There's quite a few passing mentions, and a couple of detailed sources, but as with Eastmain, I'm very sceptical of their intellectual independence; they read like press releases. The Scroll piece is the best of the lot, but it's only a single source. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.4meter4 (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.