Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The JBL and Cole Show (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The JBL and Cole Show ‎

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, article relies almost entirely on primary sources with few passing mentions in other sources. I nominated this previously and withdrew because RealDealBillMcNeal was determined to find sufficient sources. He never did and he never will because he is now blocked. A GNG tag which I placed after the first AfD was removed sometime after but the problems I brought to the talk page were never addressed. LM2000 (talk) 03:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. LM2000 (talk) 03:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.LM2000 (talk) 03:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The page has plenty of sufficient sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk • contribs)

No it doesn't. Most of them are primary sources which can't be considered when discussing notability. There are some passing mentions in reliable sources discussing WP:ROUTINE coverage, mostly of other shows, others are totally unreliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources. We even use one of the host's Facebook page as a source!LM2000 (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's 41 sources, just because ONE of the host's facebook page is a source doesn't mean anything and all the other 40 sources are reliable. Plus, I have no idea what the hell you're trying to say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the 41 sources are either WP:PRIMARY or not reliable per WP:RS and the others aren't enough to push this over the WP:GNG bar.LM2000 (talk) 20:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't know what you are trying to say.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't meet Wikipedia:Notability (web), particularly that nobility is not inherited just because Cole, JBL, and the WWE are notable. Does not have sufficient coverage in reliable third party sources. Nikki♥311 03:51, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. "Hey there! How's it goin'?" 04:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per User:Nikki311 CrashUnderride 00:44, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree with nomination. MPJ-US 00:51, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.