Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Isaias Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Isaias Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Grupo Isaías: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is some heavily white washed long term spam and I’m nominating it on the basis that it needs to have some C4 strapped to it and blown into oblivion. Praxidicae (talk) 01:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a statement as to how the article does not meet the "Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)" requirement, which is the rule that states the requirements that must be met for a company to have a stand-alone Wikipedia article? At this time the article appears to meet those requirements. Sarcasm is not a legitimate basis for deleting a Wikipedia article. Thanks.--Francisco Fredeye (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It may be worth distinguishing two aspects which are fused in this article? The first would be the Grupo Isaías / Isaias Group itself, described as having been the "most important protagonist" in Ecuador's media sector [1], [2], indicating a WP:NCORP claim. The second aspect is more like "The Isaias Group case", relating to the confiscation and subsequent legal actions, and it is presumably WP:NPOV concerns around the presentation of this aspect which triggered this AfD? AllyD (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.